The story is that the Oyo State government gave the order for Yinka Ayefele’s radio station to be demolished.

The Music House has been demolished, that is what you have read, and Mr. Ayefele is counting his losses.

But it appears that the government has just learned about the demolition the same way every other Nigerian did - reading about it.

On Monday, the Oyo State Government officially denied demolishing the music house of the gospel musician.

The government also expressed shock about the demolition, saying it was preparing to institute a panel of inquiry to unravel the identity of those who broke down some parts of the 800-million-naira edifice.

Also Read: Ayefele's FM Demolition: Document Revealing More Surfaces Online

The state government, through its counsel, Mr. Yomi Alliyu, made the denial when he appeared before Justice Iyabo Yerima of the State High Court, Ring Road, Ibadan, on Monday.

Alliyu appeared for the first and second defendants, Governor Abiola Ajimobi and Mr. Bola Abimbola (State Attorney-General), in a case instituted by Ayefele against the defendants.

The counsel said his clients were shocked to read about the reported demolition on Sunday morning.

According to him, the state government is planning to set up a panel of enquiry to find out those responsible for the demolition.

“My clients are men of honour that respect rule of law and constituted authority and will have no reason to demolish the said property,” he told the court.

Alliyu, who had earlier denied that his clients were served with court processes, quickly reversed himself when the judge showed him evidence of actual service on the first and second respondents.

The defence counsel, however, urged the court to adjourn the case pending the time the claimant would be able to file and serve his clients with notice of the ex-parte motion since the court was on vacation.

He said that filing of motion on notice and letter of urgency alone by the claimant was not enough.

But the claimant’s counsel, Mr. Olayinka Bolanle, had informed the court that the respondents had gone ahead to demolish the structure despite a court’s restraining order

“Even after the defendants had become aware of this proceeding, it is sad and unbelievable my Lord that the defendants in the wee hours of Sunday, Aug 19, went to the property in dispute and demolished it,” he told the court.

The claimant’s counsel urged the court to reiterate its earlier order restraining the defendants from further demolition of the rest of the structure pending the determination of the suit.

Justice Yerima adjourned the case until September 12 for hearing of applications and urged parties to file necessary processes before the adjourned date.

Don't forget to share this story with your friends